KEPROFESIONALAN MARA MENGURUS ISU SANGAT LEMAH DI MATA UMUM

Baru2 ini pihak MARA telah memanggil TS Anuar Musa untuk mendengar penjelasan beliau. Itupun MARA memanggilnya dalam jarak tempoh yang agak lama selepas Datuk Yaakob mengadakan sidang media menggantung jawatan TS Anuar sebagai Pengerusi MARA.

Dari situ sahaja rakyat melihat motif itu bersifat politik. TS Anuar sgt gentleman, dia datang mengadap MARA, tetapi sy mendapat tahu kedatangan TS Anuar tidak digunakan sebaiknya untuk menyelesaikan masalah. Pihak MARA lebih banyak berdiam diri.

Dalam pada itu, saya melihat TS Anuar konsisten dalam tindakan dan percakapannya. Dia tidak berubah-ubah.

Dari luar, saya dan ramai rakyat melihat MARA tidak jujur dalam kes TS Anuar Musa. Saya mendapat tahu pegawai MARA yang mahu menjawab isu2 MARA kepada rakyat telah dihalang oleh pihak tertentu dalam MARA. Saya telah mendapat 3 salinan surat daripada pegawai tersebut dan ternyata ianya penjelasan yang sangat baik.

Saya mendapati motif tuduhan ke atas TS Anuar tidak jelas dan berbau politik. Apabila TS Anuar minta dibuat forensic account ke atas MARA anda tidak mahu. Kelihatan MARA berusaha untuk melibatkan TS Anuar supaya dibuktikan bersalah. Sedangkan penjelasan sudah diberikan, TRW dan TRW Berhad adalah tidak sama, RM200,000 dan bukannya RM600,000, bukannya keputusan Lembaga Pengarah tetapi secara pentadbiran menggunakan bajet komersial CSR bukannya Dana Tabung Pendidikan MARA, yang terlibat hanya PMB sebuah badan pelaburan MARA Berhad bukannya batang tubuh MARA.

Saya dah lama fed-up dengan MARA sebenarnya. Anda boleh lihat orang-orang politik MARA yang bermewah-mewah di Australia berkereta besar yang tidakk mereka mampu membelinya, anda boleh lihat pelajar2 MARA di oversea dikontang-kanting dibiarkan tanpa bantuan semasa berdepan masalah, tidak dimonitor, MARA kelihatan malas mungkin kerana satu dua orang sahaja pegawai MARA menjaga satu negara itu. Perkara2 seperti ini patut dilihat, bukannya byk berpolitik!

Sekarang kelihatan MARA nampak byk berpolitik, TS Anuar sudah dipanggil tetapi MARA membiarkan masa berlalu nampak MARA seolah mereka buat bodoh. Adakah MARA fikir rakyat buat make do no dan tidak melihat isu ini?

Saya tidak nampak TS Anuar melakukan kesalahan. Saya nampak DS Shafie Apdal, Datuk Lan Ilani yang bermewah-mewah di luar negara mengguna Wang MARA yang bersalah tetapi MARA tidak pula ambil tindakan? Adakah kerana Datuk Yaakob, Datuk Lan Ilani dan Datuk Shafie satu negeri maka mereka diamkannya!

Saya melihat MARA yang menyiasat TS Anuar tidak ikhlas dan hanya bertujuan memalukan TS Anuar.

Cikgu Jon. KK

SURAT TERBUKA KEPADA TUN DR MAHATHIR: “SOMETHING HE CAN’T VOUCH”

Mahathir Mohammad: Something He can’t Vouch

The Malay should take a measure of precaution, the DAP will be stronger than ever after Tun Mahathir made a rebuttal that the DAP is not a Chinese chauvinist political party, but the MCA is.

In his blog, Che Det.com., Mahathir says; It is quite strange that the Malays are readily accepted the MCA in which its membership consists of 100% Chinese and obviously having close ties with the Communist Party of China.

He said, at one time, the MCA demanded the government to create a second Deputy Prime Minister post for the MCA member which was not an issue to the Malay.

Mahathir claimed that the DAP, unlike the MCA, open its memberships to all races, Its membership comprises of different races, therefore it is not a Chinese chauvinist party as claimed by many of its opponents.

There is some truth in his argument, but in the context of Malaysian politics, Mahathir’s reasoning has still remained doubtful.

The UMNO and the MCA were born together in the thick of political darkness. After Malaya gained Independence both parties compromised to stand by the constitution and uphold the reign of the Malay ruler. The request of the second deputy prime minister after so long serving the country is not a big issue. The MCA can ask anything as long as it doesn’t touch the sensitivity of race and Malay belief system.

The MCA has a relationship with the defunct Moa’s regime is immaterial.  The people Republic of China had changed its political course during the reign of Deng Zio Peng. The China open economic policy becomes a stage for the global market. And the country is not anymore a threat to Malaysia. Along similar lines, the same goes to the DAP, the Chief Minister of Penang is said to have a relationship with the Israel.

The truth is, no one will deny that the MCA leaders had teamed up their effort during the country’s economic downturn, all leaders were putting all of their energy to ensure that the citizenry were not in abject poverty. That’s what history has shown us. The MCA obeyed the constitution, compromised by agreeing with the Malay on increasing Malay economic quota up to 30%. The Malay has been coming along so well, in education, economy and other social importance and religious matter without harboring a feeling of hatred towards UMNO.

The MCA seems well adopted and has honored the constitution and lived on under the Malay premiership. MCA’s social conservative ideology is in line with the UMNO in which both are maintaining their principle to protect their interest within the realm of compromise. Never in a million year, the MCA will sabotage the government for not full-filling their request.

Perhaps, Mahathir would agree to this. The word asking or requesting and demanding are two distinctive words, Asking denotes someone is more polite asking a favor, expecting approval or disapproval, this relationship only occurs in the MCA/UMNO. And the word ‘demanding’ means that the person is trying to get something by force. Protest, street demonstration is a form of demanding over one’s dissatisfaction which is not always congruent with the rulers and normally it will yield political tension. The participation of the DAP and other opposition parties in the Bersih’s demonstration proves that the DAP’s behavior is outside the norm of compromise.

For a generation the concept of Malay rights has been chiseled in the Malay psyche. The UMNO political rival is the DAP. Liberal democracy or secularism is the number one enemy of the Malays and Islam because the concept will unplug the privileges that are enjoyed by the Malay at all levels. And Islam will be banished.

In reminiscence of the 1969 general election, the Malays are still blaming the DAP for igniting racial sentiment during a political campaign in the 69 general election against the federal government.

The concept of Malay right  that had been operating  in Malaysia since Independence had been disputed. The DAP campaigned against Bumiputra privileges outlined by article 153 of the constitution, made major gains in the election and this had haunted the minds of Malaysians.

The establishment of the DAP is not at all based on the agreement of race. But it existed only to advance the liberal democratic concept as to disseminate the concept of equal society due to privileges given to the Malays.

The DAP is said to be inspired by the PAP style of government, which is historically is hated by the Malay organization. It was led by Devan Nair and several others who at one time were the PAP members who inspired to establish a political mood of Singapore in Malaysia. Yet the party registration was rejected by ROS. Only after the name of the new party changed its name to the DAP and Devan Nair was the Secretary General of the party.

Looking back at the political history of the establishment of the DAP during Tunku, and  the political crisis between the PAP led by  Lee Kuan Yew with Perikatan – it is scary. The crisis was bogged down to racial and political ideology.

Even though we have not seen the same precedent in today’s DAP political approach, but suffice to say that the ideology of social democratic and secularism is a big threat to UMNO and the Malay people in general. We could also say, the DAP must have been successful to some extent shipping their ideology into the Malay mind. Apparently, up until today the political orientation of the DAP remains the same.

The Malay perceived the Singapore’s model of government is DAP’s choice, How will it run the country?  Hypothetically, the Malay rights and the power of the King and Sultan will be deleted. And Malaysia will be a republic just like Singapore.

Mahathir understood well the process of politics in Malaysia. He is well informed that what will happen if the DAP is in power and the democratic social secularist system is being exercised in Malaysia- the pride of Malay religion-Islam and Malay special privileges will be deleted.

As to convince that the Malay privileges would stay, he poses quantitative measure, stating that it would be impossible for Lim Kit Siang to be the prime Minister if the Pakatan Harapan win the election. The DAP has lesser seats than its member of constituent shares.

Again Mahathir’s rationalizes, even though if the pack win the election, it is not been feasible that the king, the sultan and the article 153 in the constitution will be abolished.  The DAP has lesser power over another member of the constituent. Since the Malay member of the component is bigger in number compared to the DAP than the Malay  party  would solve most of the policies regarding the Malay interest.

The mathematical level of thought is not the only determinant factor that can be accepted as true in all given of the state of political business. Quantitative measures such as value and beliefs can give great effects in such a given situation.

Even though, the Malay is dominant in the pack, dominant in the number of seats,  but could it be possible the contradictory values they have might not consolidate the value and beliefs that each individual has.

Liberal and secular mind is not in the scruples of an individual so called Muslim. The Pakatan Harapan consists of Malay party members whose Malay values  and Islam is stronger in their heart mostly those defunct UMNO and PAS members. They hate UMNO but not their religion and their identity.

Ironically, All parties agree to place the past behind them pretending that each of them can be equally safe as non Muslim. And yet in the public, they speak on the importance of race and religion and the words of promise are vibrating through their lips calling to vote them.

Compromise is the foundation of the liberal concept and the UMNO practices without sacrificing its belief system and values. In the Pakatan Harapan, will the member of the party is willing to compromise on its political principle in order to stay united? Does the member agree to  compromise in renewing the constitution for the purpose of obtaining the equal status and share among races?

No magic – the party, the DAP that has long been stigmatized  as a Chinese chauvinist party is being readily accepted by the Malays. Malays and Muslims in particular, whose bias ingrained in the wit for years might change their position overnight. Mahathir is asking the  Malay voters to take a chance on something he can’t vouch. (Putrajaya Insider)

http://merdeka-online.com/home/surat-terbuka-kepada-tun-dr-mahathir-something-he-cant-vouch/